New housing finance initiatives and delivery stumbling blocks
While (as noted in yesterday’s post) the capacity of the state machinery to facilitate housing delivery has been called to question, Rand Merchant Bank and First National Bank both announced new projects.
RMB’s project involves a loan agreement with the Dutch Development Bank (FMO) in the
In terms of RMB’s model, the 33 million Euro loan from FMO will focus on project funding while the 40 million Euro loan from AFD will provide risk underwriting for the bank so that it can extend its end user finance further down market.
FNB’s project involves a joint R800 million commercial property and housing finance deal to build over 3000 homes in a new
Like the RMB approach, the FNB investment is both for property development (R300 million of the
This is all very exciting, and feeds quite critically into the need for affordable housing supply so banks can meet their Financial Sector Charter housing targets. And yet, other news reports a slow down in the housing tender index. Industry insight reports that “the slowdown in the supply of housing defelpoments started in the 1st quarter of 2005 as an increasing number of developers struggled with obstacles such as the price and availiablity of land, legislative bottlenecks at municipal level, a slowdown in property sales off plan (causes by higher house prices that erode affordagbility) and skills shortages that delay project completions, to name but a few”. At the same time, demand for smaller homes has accelerated from 62% of homes passed with smaller square meterage in 2005 to 81% in 2006).
An interesting article in the Business Day highlights an issue I’ve raised previously in this spot: that unlike the Financial Sector Charter which encourages service delivery to the poor, the Construction Charter focuses primarily on internal ownership and management arrangements of the construction industry. The Construction Charter does not provide “an incentive for building contractors who build in [the low income] sector of the market. Social infrastructure spend only gets scant mention in the corporate social investment chapter of the charter and counts only five points towards a total of 100 points on the scorecard, which is used to measure overall empowerment performance.” When contractors can realise double digit profit margins in the development of large scale commercial projects, low cost housing project profit margins of 3% are not enough to encourage engagement in this sector.
A forecasting director at the Bureau of Economic Research suggests that profit margins need to be pushed up – however, this would add to the cost of construction and undermine affordability. Rather, it would seem a rethink of the Construction Charter would be in order.
Without this, the banks fears that they’ll have nothing to fund will certainly be realised. Speaking to the Business Day, Banking Association housing task team head
Tomorrow: Property market dynamics