Category: Inclusionary zoning

And if requiring fail? Part 2, is stronger than its execution

21 March, 2014 (09:00) | Affordability, Affordable Housing, de Blasio, Development, Housing, Inclusionary zoning, Innovations, New York City, Theory, US News |

[Continued from yesterday's Part 1.]   By:David A. Smith   Yesterday we saw that during his populist redistributionist campaign,  now-mayor of New York City Bill de Blasio claimed he would be able to produce 50,000 affordable apartments, basically for free (i.e. no taxpayer money), through enactment of mandatory inclusionary zoning.  He based this boast on […]

And if requiring fail? Part 1, The threat

20 March, 2014 (10:56) | Affordability, Affordable Housing, de Blasio, Development, Housing, Inclusionary zoning, Innovations, New York City, Theory, US News |

By:David A. Smith   As New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration starts with a bang (such as his assault on charter schools) and aggressively reversal of many Bloombergian policies (such as stop-and-frisk, which seemed sensible to me), what will he do with housing?   I’m only listening to you until the cameras go […]

The wrong symbol, the wrong story: Part 3, From Washington to Mount Holly

12 March, 2014 (09:00) | Civil Rights, Discrimination, Economic development, ED4ED, Eminent domain, Eviction, Fair Housing, Homeownership, Inclusionary zoning, Law, mixed-income housing, Supreme Court, US News |

[Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and the preceding Part 1.]   By:David A. Smith   As we saw in Part 2, after the Justice Department had Emily Litella-ed on defending its ‘disparate impact’ settlement cudgel in the St. Paul case, the focus of legal symbologists shifted to Mount Holly, New Jersey, where what had been a […]

The wrong symbol, the wrong story: Part 2, From St. Paul to Washington

11 March, 2014 (09:00) | Civil Rights, Discrimination, Economic development, ED4ED, Eminent domain, Eviction, Fair Housing, Homeownership, Inclusionary zoning, Law, mixed-income housing, Supreme Court, US News |

  [Continued from yesterday's Part 1.]   By:David A. Smith   In yesterday’s Part 1, the story of Mount Holly Gardens, which ought to have been another in the line of important cases on the limitations of eminent domain for economic development (ED4ED), had become redefined as a symbol of the Administration’s deployment of its […]

The wrong symbol, the wrong story: Part 1, From Mount Holly to St. Paul

10 March, 2014 (13:36) | Civil Rights, Discrimination, Economic development, ED4ED, Eminent domain, Eviction, Fair Housing, Homeownership, Housing, Inclusionary zoning, Law, Supreme Court, US News |

By:David A. Smith   For a case to reach the Supreme Court, it must involve a big principle of Constitutional law and there must be some jurisprudence along the litigation trail to suggest current precedents are in conflict with one another.    [New York City involuntary landlord James Harmon didn't have conflicting jurisprudence – however […]