When and where modern housing was born
What defines modern housing? Tour enough castles, abbeys, and stately homes and it isn’t hard to identify the five critical features:

State of the art, thirteenth century
1. Central heating rather than fireplaces
2. Running water instead of basins and pitchers
3. Flush toilet and sewer instead of chamber pots and outhouses
4. Bright lighting instead of candles
5. Electricity for appliances

One of the five great technological advances
So ingrained are these things in our consciousness that by now they’re mandated by every formal building code – and they constitute a sufficiency for the embryo house.
[Editorial note: I toyed with adding sealable clear windows to this list, but decided against it, since we find such windows dating back eight hundred years (Saint Chapelle in

Beautiful and delicate, but unlivable: the Sainte Chapelle

Vermeer, Girl Reading A Letter, circa 1658
When did such homes become commonplace? Over what period of time?

Where else but the world’s fastest growing Industrial Revolution city?
To my surprise, there’s an answer, and it’s unexpected:
By the end of the Civil War, the newest dwellings more closely resembled those built a hundred years later than those erected only twenty years earlier, for technologically housing had advanced half a millennium in a single generation. To the middle and upper classes of that generation, it was nothing short of a miracle. Page 45.
The place for this miracle? The cradle of American apartment living, the birthplace of municipal finance for infrastructure:

Immigrants landing in
The time? You’d think it would have been a slow process, but in fact all five innovations came in a headlong rush, a mere quarter-century leading up to the Civil War — and, in the manner of such technological revolutions, they all reinforced each other.
You’d think it would have been a slow process. For something essential, the technology of housing has advanced throughout human history with extraordinary slowness. Fireplaces and chimneys, which brought heat to every room in the house and completely changed castle and palace design, were invented around the thirteenth century. For the next six hundred years, little happened to improve houses beyond the addition of gradually larger windows as glassmaking advanced.
As readers will recall, I’ve become intrigued by the history of affordable housing globally and of financial institutions and how the US housing finance ecosystem came to be, and it was in that vein that I read
John Steele Gordon’s history of the

Don’t you want to know my story?
The subtitle is much less racy: Jay Gould, Jim Fisk, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and the

Vanderbilt bestrides the railroads. The sign reads,
All freight must pass here and pay any tolls we demand.
In this lively book, Gordon covers executive-suite shenanigans, complete with barricaded corporate headquarters protected by cannon, a zaftig mistress and her handlebar-mustache impresario lover, financial hijinks such as trying to corner the supply of money, and stock-price manipulation of a kind to make Frank Raines green with envy.

Jubilee Jim Fisk of the
His point is the emergence of Wall Street securities regulation – it was first professionalized through self-governance after the financial catastrophe known as the Erie Railway; government regulation came only later. [More on this in a future post. – Ed.] Along the way, however, he includes a chapter, the
Development, speculation, technological improvement, and urbanization all went hand in hand, all driving from the booming economy led by transportation, first the

From
and then the railroads, beginning in 1843 with the celebrated New York and Erie Railroad:

Connecting the Great Lakes to the Atlantic, via
Let’s start with
In order to regulate the city’s growth in some coherent way, the government in 1811 produced the grid plan for the areas of the city not yet developed. This plan ignored both the better aspects of city planning as it was understood at the time and the nature of

Unoccupied but fully gridded
The agent of change? Those profit-oriented entrepreneurial entities, the dreaded real estate developers.
Rather, as the plan forthrightly stated, it was adopted because “straight-sided and right-angled houses are the most cheap to build and the most convenient to live in.” It was a plan, in other words, that only real-estate speculators could love, and they took it to their collective bosom with a passion. Page 32.
[At roughly the same time,

What drove the speculators? Profits in standardization:
Except for the greatest palaces on

Today we find them charming
The speculators were very conservative in taste, each unwilling to be even a little out in front of the pack in style for fear that their equally conservative and socially insecure nouveau riche customers would be scared away. By the 1850’s the Italianate style, with its brownstone front, elaborate bracketed cornice, carved lintels, high stoop, and double front door beneath a small but ornate portico was virtually the only style of row house being built. Page 42.
The new houses were marvels of technology:
Primitive forced-air furnaces were first installed in the 1840s, but those worked fitfully and as often as not provided more soot and fumes than heat. By the 1860’s steam heat, with all its efficiency and technological, if not esthetic, advantages, was being installed in the latest row houses.
Technology reached the kitchen as well:
Two inventions transformed the kitchen at this time as well. The cast-iron cook stove replaced the open hearth and the icebox came into use. Soon the stoves were fitted with water tanks, and hot running water –- undreamed-of a generation earlier – became a commonplace, while the icebox made a cold glass of milk in July a marvelous reality. Page 43.

Better cooking, easier cleaning, greater efficiency: what’s not to like?
If the kitchen was better, so too was the plumbing, giving rise to a new room in the house:
Soon new houses could not be sold unless they had water closets and bathrooms, and the city was forced into a crash program of sewer and water-main construction.

Mark II: the second generation of toilet, from 1878
Changing household consumption had dramatic unintended consequences:
The drop in demand for well water caused the water table to rise alarmingly and forced the city to construct storm and drainage sewers to overcome an epidemic of flooded basements.
As always happens, urbanization outstripped municipal infrastructure. Markets were moving faster than government, which raced to catch up, with an explosion of building:
All this sewer construction – as much as fifty miles a year – added greatly to the city’s appearance of being one huge, never-completed construction site.
That huge demand for capital led
But when water from Westchester’s Croton River first came into the city via aqueduct in 1842 the situation began to change very rapidly. Croton water gave
Like many a global-south city today,
This incessant change, this constant building up and tearing down, had its consequences. While New Yorkers were proud of their city, extolled its grandeur, and heralded its future, few of them loved it. “Why should it be loved as a city?” Harpers Monthly asked in 1856. “It is never the same city for a dozen years though. A man born in

The shock of the new: Five Points, 1859
Note the presence of both old (clapboard) and new (rowhouse) construction

Twenty years later, 1879, the mid-rises are dominant
It also led to traffic jams:
As early as the 1840’s, newspapers were bemoaning how crowded and noisy the streets were and how slow and tangled the traffic.

“Noisy, roaring, tumbling, bustling, stormy, and turbulent – and I don’t mean myself!”
Walt Whitman
In 1842 Walt Whitman wrote in an editorial, “What can

Congestion relieving invention: a Broadway walkover bridge, 1860s
It is ever thus.

An intrinsic condition of cities?
Write a comment