Buying the farm

June 30, 2008 | Eminent domain, Land use, Local issues, US News

Every now and then, somebody does it right. 

 

In the bold action of a man confident of his politics and his policy, Florida governor Charlie Crist has pulled the trigger on what looks like a long-term masterstroke.  As reported in The Washington Post:

 

Soke

In the stillness is the act …

 

In an ambitious maneuver to help restore the Everglades, the state of Florida has struck a tentative deal to buy U.S. Sugar Corp. for $1.75 billion and turn many of its 187,000 acres of farmland into reservoirs.

 

The price is $9,300 an acre which, based on the very quickest perusal of a Florida land Web site, isn’t a premium, and a drop in the bucket compared to the value of coastal Florida land like Briny Breezes.

 

By buying the company, the state of Florida also controls development of all that land.  It’s well within the realm of possibility that smart-growth subdivisions peppered within a preserved area could fetch high prices and contribute to ecological and environmental stability.  It would also substantially recoup the state’s capital, a trick often used (by such as Marvin Davis and Kerk Kerkorian) when a public company (like US Sugar) has vast real estate holdings that are undervalued by the capital markets.

 

The same trick was pulled more recently, in Blackstone’s purchase of Equity Office, as I documented extensively at the time in Barbarians at the REIT? and Barbarians, the aftermath: Part 1, the overture.

 

Who was the mastermind? 

 

Mastermind1

 

Governor Crist:

 

Wapo_florida_moves_to_restore_wetlands_buker_080625

From the Washington Post: Robert Buker, chief executive of U.S. Sugar Corp., left, walks to a news conference with Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and Shannon Estenoz, vice chair of the South Florida Water Management District Board, in Palm Beach County.

 

The plan, described by Gov. Charlie Crist as the largest conservation purchase in Florida’s history, envisions restoring some of the natural flow of water to the Everglades from Lake Okeechobee.

 

Crist, who has been mentioned as a possible running mate for presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain, made the announcement Tuesday after months of secret negotiations with the sugar company.

 

Like many another coup, it was hatched in private.

 

“It was a really well-kept secret. I think the Pentagon would be jealous of how well it was kept,” said Susan Kennedy, executive director of the Everglades Coalition.

 

[Governor Crist] called the purchase “as monumental” as the founding of Yellowstone National Park.

 

Yellowstone_1875

Yellowstone Lake 1875

 

The patchwork of farmland totals 292 square miles, about equal to the land area of New York City’s five boroughs.

 

New_york_and_dallas

New York and Dallas-Fort Worth, for comparison

That much land at $9,300 an acre?

 

The surprise effort is aimed at halting the degradation of the Everglades, which at 1.5 million acres is the third-largest national park in the lower 48 states, behind Death Valley and Yellowstone.  Over the years, water from areas north of the massive marsh has been diverted to the fast-growing cities of South Florida and for agriculture, and pollutants from sewage and farming have flowed in.

 

Loss of the Everglades is a classic example of tragedy of the commons – that any common resource which can be exploited for private gain is a risk of overuse and exhaustion:

 

Childe_hassam_boston_common

Boston Common, 1875

Preserved against overgrazing

 

To defend the commons against private predation, a higher regulatory body – usually government – steps in and enforces managed use.  Kudos to Governor Crist for seeing that such a move was necessary here, or the watershed area would continue being whittled down.

 

Everglades_1

This used to be the glades

 

Restoration has been a state and federal priority for years and is the goal of a troubled $11 billion program that, until now, had envisioned the construction of hundreds of high-tech wells and huge aquifers in an elaborate re-engineering of South Florida’s hydrology. Critics have called the plan impractical and say it has little relationship to the pre-development ecosystem. The project has fallen behind schedule since it was approved eight years ago.

 

Okeechobee_dike

The Okeechobee dike

 

It’s so hard for government to think of buying out private actors that government adopts a mental workaround of developing a fantastic and uneconomic technological protection.  (Would that, rather than compromising nature, we had simply bought out all the below-sea-level parts of New Orleans the day after Katrina!)

 

The sugar company buyout puts a new and simpler option on the table: Water can flow from the lake into filtering marshes. The cleaner water could eventually be sent onward into the “sea of grass” at the southern end of the peninsula. A direct lake-glades connection, even one comprising levee-lined retention areas, has long been a dream of environmentalists.

 

Sometimes it’s so much easier just to buy back the private rights.

 

“You’ve got to do something to transition lake water to the Everglades,” said Carol Wehle, executive director of the South Florida Water Management District, the independent agency that supervises the network of canals, levees and waterways in the lower third of the state. She said the primary goal of the U.S. Sugar buyout will be Everglades restoration, rather than providing water for sprawling urban areas in South Florida.

 

“It will be a structured, managed system, but it will definitely connect Lake Okeechobee with the Everglades,” she said.

 

Okeechobee_from_space

Lake Okeechobee from space

 

Restoring the land to public hands creates all sort of public-benefit options.  And the buyout is a non-recoverable cost, funded out of taxpayers’ money – the sort of big infrastructure purchase that only government can do. 

 

Some company assets could be sold to other sugar companies, leaving some cane fields and orange groves still under cultivation. Because the U.S. Sugar holdings are scattered, the state will try to swap land with other sugar cane companies to create a single corridor for water to flow into the reservoirs and on to the Everglades.

 

Rationalizing checkerboard holdings benefits everyone – as we saw in the history of railroad land grants, a checkerboard approach to grants creates an immediate market and leads to a natural consolidation with money as the winding sheet.

 

“Acquiring this large swath south of Lake Okeechobee will be an historic turning point for the largest watershed project in the world,” Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said.

 

Environmentalists, who only days earlier had been infuriated by Crist’s reversal of his longtime opposition to offshore oil drilling, were thrilled and surprised by the pact, which was first reported on Monday by the Palm Beach Post.

 

Jumping_Croc

And we locals are pretty happy too!

 

U.S. Sugar is based in Clewiston, “America’s sweetest town,” on the west bank of Lake Okeechobee. The company was founded in 1931 by auto executive Charles Stewart Mott, who saw riches in the muck that bordered the lake.

 

Charles_stewart_mott_1915

Charles Stewart Mott, 1915

 

By the end of World War II, it was the biggest sugar company in the United States. Today it employs 1,700 people and produces 700,000 tons of cane sugar annually.

 

But the industry has been blamed for many of South Florida’s environmental problems. Agriculture has dramatically changed the ancient landscape, and fertilizers have polluted the water.

 

Human development is subject to Paracelsus’ principle: nothing is poisonous, the dose makes the poison, or its modern form, mice kept in a laboratory always get cancer.

 

Tab_drink

Pour enough of that stuff through you and you too will get cancer

 

From beginning to end, the prime mover was Governor Crist:

 

U.S. Sugar Senior Vice President Robert Coker said the plan originated with Crist last fall in a meeting with company representatives in Tallahassee when the governor made a statement seemingly out of the blue: “I just think we ought to buy you out.”

 

Lightning strikes!  American history is full of such moves using money to buy land:

 

Thomas Jefferson’s 1803 Louisiana purchase, which we bought from Napoleon rather than tussle with Britain for it.

 

Louisiana_purchase

 

Jefferson_franklin

Critics said he had no authority to make the purchase …

… and at the time, the Treasury didn’t have the money

 

Said Coker: “I was very surprised. I’ve been dealing with Everglades issues for 27 years with this company, and nobody’s ever taken that kind of bold stroke, to say we’re going to solve this thing once and for all.”

 

US Minister to Mexico Gadsden’s 1853 purchase of southern Arizona:

 

Gadsden-purchase

South of the Gila, west of the Rio Grande 

 

James_gadsden

He bought it via treaty …

 

Under the agreement, the company will continue operations for six years. Then it will hand the state 155,000 acres of sugar cane, 30,000 acres of orange trees, a commercial short-line railroad, a private railroad for hauling cane from field to factory, a sugar mill, a sugar refinery, and a just-completed orange juice plant.

 

William H. Seward’s 1867 purchase of Alaska:

 

Sewards_folly

Bought for two cents an acre

 

Ak_purchase_check

We paid by check (the actual check for $7,200,000)

 

William_seward_old

Lincoln’s rival, later his Secretary of State

 

With six years to plan, and the state’s credit behind the purchase, all sorts of value-additive possibilities open up. 

 

“We’re turning over lock, stock and barrel,” Coker said.

 

It’s a brilliant stroke – and it raises another possibility in my mind.  Want to formalize slums?  Just buy everybody out.

 

Good for you, Governor.

 

Charlie_crist_fist_pump

A man who thinks he made a good deal

Send post as PDF to www.pdf24.org

Write a comment