Searching for affordable housing history: a call for ideas

April 4, 2008 | Admin, History, Readers

I’m asking for your help.

 Ask_for_help

It’s already too late for that

 

On my company’s conference room wall is an 1855 map of old Boston,

 

1855_color

 

given to me twenty years ago when I left my old firm (and eventually started Recap), and on the peninsula then known as Dorchester Heights, and now known as South Boston, in delicate pinks and greens, is a small cluster of black buildings:

 

1855_house_of_industry

 

The house of correction (jail)

The lunatic asylum

The house of industry a/k/a the poorhouse a/k/a nineteenth century affordable housing

 

1855_house_of_industry_ultra_closeup

 

A century and a half later, that same site now houses Harbor Point, formerly the infamous Columbia Point public housing ghetto,

 

Columbia_point_aerial

A pile of pre-rubble, in splendid isolation

 

Columbia_point_from_water

You can all live in that warren, can’t you?

 

reborn a quarter century ago as mixed-income public-private affordable housing. 

 

Harbor_point

What money can do

 

Finding that little black icon, I think, set me on my ongoing quest to discover the history of affordable housing.  Ever since I got into this business, it’s been my lot to work in an area that is, as far as I can tell, woefully under-studied.  Except for occasional works (like Larry Vale’s excellent From the Puritans to the Projects), there’s almost no structural or general scholarship about affordable housing.  I’ve been reduced to catching fleeting glimpses referenced in other histories by historians who are pursuing something else.

 

The lack of examples is a pity.  Affordable housing does not exist in economic nature, which means that somebody has to create it, and sustain it.  Historical examples matter because they show us what can be done in low-tech, low-information, low-democracy environments — and they therefore give us clues as to the assembly sequence to move from a less-complex ecosystem to a more complex one.

 

So far I’ve posted on:

 

The world’s first planned unit development (Pharaonic Luxor workers’ village)

 

Just as Egypt was the cradle of spontaneous communities, so too is it the birthplace of the world’s first planned unit developments: the workers’ village of Deir el Medina at Luxor.

 

Luxor-workers-village-4

The workers’ village, 1,500 years older than Pompeii

 

The world’s first apartments (Roman insulae)

 

Built of brick, probably unplastered and little ornamented, they were entered from exterior stairs that led up, over a ground floor of shops, to corridors off which opened single rooms that were numbered.  Each room had its own window of mica or selenite, translucent enough to remind you morning had arrived.  Some rooms had small balconies for taking the evening air (and disposing of garbage and night soil). 

 

Ostia_horrea

Ostia street scene

 

Despite variations in quality and allegations of questionable safety and sanitation, the apartment block became the most common form of Roman housing, as families began moving into rented spaces owned by landlords. 

 

Most apartment blocks were made with timber and mud brick, making them prone to fire and collapse.  The upper floors were without heating or running water and only sometimes had lavatories.  Later designs seemed to have been built more safely, with fired brick and concrete, but there were no other improvements as far as sanitation and standard of living.

 

The world’s first homeownership subsidy (Constantine‘s panes aedium)

 

If, as I’ve postulated, we are living in the century of cities, and if cities will compete based on comparative advantage, then workforce housing isn’t a luxury, it’s a competitive necessity, and the cities that crack the problem first will win the century relative to those that do not.

 

Constantine-massive-head

He who had the best workforce housing ruled the world

 

The world’s first affordable apartments (English 13th century almshouses)

 

As far as I can tell, the first efforts to create sustainable affordable housing arose in England in the tenth century, with the almshouses:

 

The first recorded Almshouse was founded by King Athelstan in York in the 10th century AD. The oldest charity still in existence is thought to be the Hospital of St. Oswald in Worcester, founded circa 990.

 

Athelstan_at_malmesbury_abb

King Athelstan of Kent, died 100 years before William the Conqueror

 

In this, the almshouses merely extended the Christian charity of almsgiving (from Gregory of Nyssa, 335-390 AD).

 

The world’s first high-rise flats (New York City co-ops)

 

By 1900, as discussed in Bob Bruegmann’s book Sprawl, the Lower East Side was probably the most densely settled place on Earth, most of it in these squalid tenements:

 

They typically housed twenty different families who shared one toilet, and in winter influenza swept through the freezing rooms and thinned the population for the next year’s wave of newcomers. 

 

For some, tenements were at least an improvement over housing for the poor prior to the 1850s, when 20,000 New Yorkers were literally submerged and lived in cellars or unheated shacks in and around Five Points (new Foley Square), New York’s notorious first and worst slum. 

 

New_york_brewery_five_points

The Old Brewery, Five Points

 

Gangs_of_new_york_paradise_square

Five Points, the setting for Martin Scorcese’s Gangs of New York

 

In this, they were not so very different from the current inhabitants of Nairobi’s Kibera and similar spontaneous communities around the major cities in fusion countries:

 

By 1890, when the police reporter and photographer Jacob Riis published his watershed book about the degradation of tenement life, How the Other Half Lives, there were over 32,000 tenement houses in New York with 1.25 million people living in them.  [40 people to a tenement. — Ed.]

 

Riis_children_mulberry_street

Children sleeping on Mulberry Street, 1889

 

I’m especially interested in discriminatory taxation (especially of property) that had influence on affordability of housing configuration.  Several examples about which I’d like to know more are:

 

Window tax.  In seventeenth-century England, dwellings were taxed based on the based on the total number of windows — so people built houses with fewer apertures.

 

Lots_of_windows

If you want to flaunt your wealth, build a lot of windows

 

New England saltbox.  The New England saltbox house has a curious long sloping roof down to a single story out back; I recall reading that this was because Colonial houses were assessed based on the number of stories, measuring from the lowest point.

 

Saltbox_litchfield

Saltbox, Litchfield, Connecticut

 

Bastides as new towns.  When Edward I Longshanks was busily conquering large swaths of France, he garrisoned his dominions with land grants inside his newly created bastide hilltop towns.

 

Bastide

The bastide of Monflanquin, Lot et Garonne

 

Have reference for any of the above?  Know of any others?  Send me an email, or leave a comment below.

 

Edward_i_mcgoohan

Come up with some answers or I’ll defenestrate you

PDF Creator    Send article as PDF   

 

Comments

Comment from Martha Bridegam
Date: April 5, 2008, 1:22 am

In case helpful:

- I’d always understood the saltbox shape was a practical means of deflecting high winds by setting the long side of the roof against them.

- For another example of centrally planned housing, look up Le Saline Royale d’Arc et Senans. It’s an oppressive place to visit. See http://www.salineroyale.com/ . Ugly forms cause ugly functions to repeat: Gypsies were “assembled” and later “interned” there by the Vichy government in 1941-2. http://www.cheminsdememoire.gouv.fr/page/afficheLieu.php?idLang=fr&idLieu=1207

Comment from J. Powers
Date: April 15, 2008, 6:16 pm

This is mere hearsay, but perhaps worth a bit of your time. Half-timbered houses in the so-called Tudor style (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timber_framing) have an interesting little urban myth attached to them. In French, “meuble” (akin to “move”) means furniture, while “immeuble” (thus, “immovable”) means real-estate. I was told that, because half-timbered houses can be put up and taken down so expeditiously (2-4 weeks max), they qualified as “meuble” under Alsatian tax law. The style became popular in part because you didn’t even have to pay taxes on a house that was considered furniture for tax purposes.