Finance type: the House of the Three Mortgages
“Holmes,” said Watson, turning a five-pound note between his fingers, “I’ve been thinking back to our visit to your brother Mycroft and that extraordinary bank — I should say, investment bank — of which he is a director.”

The carriage of a banker: Mycroft Holmes
Holmes looked up from the Times, where he had been perusing the foreclosure notices with what seemed to be a perhaps too-cheerful countenance. “Indeed. And?”
“Aside from my bedazzlement at the array of loan features” — Watson consulted his small notebook — “such a welter of language that Mycroft uses, with self-amortization, accrual, participation, interest rate reset, prepayment options, lockouts, and yield maintenance! — it has occurred to me that loans could also be classified by their principal source of credit.”

Watson noted that the broadsheets did not distinguish loans by type
“Capital, Watson!” said Holmes. “You positively scintillate today. There are, in fact, three principal credit types. What great motivation unites all lenders?”
“They want their money back.”
“Precisely so. And thus, inherent in every decision to lend (as opposed to grant or gift) is a judgment about how and why the borrower will be able to repay it. For a lender, therefore, the core question in the mortgage credit analysis is:
Are we lending because we believe in the value of:
an asset, an entity, or a government?
Materializing a whiteboard from the available pixilated space, he drew upon it a small diagram, as the intoxicating smell of dry-erase filled our rooms:
Finance: three main types
· Project finance. Security is specific asset(s). Often non-recourse.
· Corporate finance. Security is entity’s credit. More flexible terms.
· Sovereign lending. Security is the government’s credibility itself.

There are three main types
We thus see, Holmes went on, that among the three financial types the underwriting process is quite different:
· Project finance. The main source of credit is the physical collateral, the property. Often the loan is non-recourse, so that the borrower entity itself is not liable even if the loan defaults.
· Corporate finance. The credit source is the enterprise that uses the money. The individual piece of property forms a source of cash flows, but in the end, the entire enterprise is pledged.
· Sovereign lending. The credit source is government itself. As Mycroft discussed, both Bank of England gilts and US Treasuries are backed by no physical assets; rather they have the ‘full faith and credit’ of the sovereign United States behind them.
In the

Here’s to project finance!
In the

Love live corporate finance!
(”That,” Holmes asided, “is part of why massive takeovers like Blackstone’s bid for Equity Office can happen so readily; capital assembly is quick because the underwriting occurs once, at the entity level. Individual properties need not be examined in detail. By contrast, Vornado’s offer, which is predicated on disaggregating properties and financing them separately, takes long to put together “)

We agree — both methods can work!
“Yet these distinctions cannot be pure,” interjected Watson. “The typical home mortgage is both collateral based — if you do not pay the loan, the lender forecloses on the house — and recourse, with the borrower still obligated even after losing the property.”
“As many speculative condo buyers may find out soon” murmured Holmes. “For that matter, large bond issues of state housing finance agencies mix corporate-finance elements into a project-financed pool, when the agency extends its own credit, implicitly or explicitly, into the issue.”
“But what about sovereign lending? We have barely touched on that.”
“And sovereign lending is at one level the simplest, at another the hardest. You see, when one lends to the sovereign government, as our friend the worldly philosopher has done in Chad, one is exposed not merely to the normal credit risks of an individual venture (project finance) or company (corporate finance), but also to the capriciousness of rulers, sovereigns who may choose not to be bound. You recall the matter, do you not?”
“Long have I admired your treatises on the hundred and seventeen types of tobacco,” began our guest, twisting the brim of his brushed black silk top hat. “I have the honor to administer a trust operated by a small philanthropic society,”

“whose funds, raised by subscription, are deployed throughout the world to aid the suffering and encourage the enterprising. My predecessor has placed me in a most untenable situation with an African potentate. Our society, in concert with certain private investors, funded a major pipeline and refinery to extract the potential from a vast oil field that for decades had lain unused while its owners suffered.”
The Exxon-led consortium was willing to build the 665-mile pipeline from landlocked Chad to the sea only with the World Bank’s backing, said Rashad Kaldany, director of oil, gas and mining for the bank and its private investment agency, the International Finance Corporation. With
“Yes, I do; and as I recall, the matter continues imperfectly unresolved.”

It irritated Watson that Holmes thought he would not remember previous blog posts
“That is correct. Unfortunately, this problem will survive us, Watson, for it long antedates us, going back four hundred years. In the sixteenth century, the richest and most powerful king in Europe,

“But first, I shall marry Mary I of
“Bankrupt?” Watson was appalled. “A monarch unable to pay her bills? Unthinkable!”
“Oh, he did it in a grand style,” laughed Holmes. “Philip II repudiated his debts. After all, what could the bankers do? As a future tyrant will say in a slightly different form, ‘how many divisions do the Fuggers have?’”
“No gentleman would do such a thing. He would be banned from all the clubs.”

“Imagine the scandal when he received his expulsion notice!”
“Something of the sort happened, at least among the bankers. The credit markets refused to do business with him, so he was forced to curtail his efforts to lead the Counter-Reformation throughout
The reign of Philip II of

Portrait of a sixteenth century Genoese banker: Christoph Fugger
They further punished

I am not bankrupt; I simply do not choose to pay my debts.
“Even so, Philip’s

You have to read the fine print to discover the mischief
Watson shook his head. “In a globally connected world, such as the future will have, no nation can be entirely outside the capital markets. They take their revenge in depreciating the nation’s currency. Your brother Mycroft pointed out that paper money is the ultimate form of sovereign lending, and hyperinflation can be seen as the modern form of national bankruptcy.”

Watson wanted to know if he should shift his money out of sterling.
“Correct. And in the twentieth century, loss of international banking confidence in a nation’s fiscal policy will manifest itself in hyperinflation and credit collapse, as in Mexico’s Peso Crisis, requiring a complex financial assistance package from the IMF, and the US and Canadian governments, to stabilize it.”
“Then why do the multilateral lenders like our worldly friend lend to sovereigns? Why not lend against individual properties or projects?”
“It is more complex, and when you lend in a foreign and sovereign nation, even the best protocols one puts in place can be subverted by a sufficiently unscrupulous monarch. The World Bank arose at a time when there was no other sustainable credit in developing or recovering nations, so they had little choice. But how to move global lending into the twenty-first century is indeed quite a three pipe problem.”

“If we can crack sovereign lending, the world will become rich.”