Kofi Annan’s affordable rental
A price of fame is heightened scrutiny. So it has emerged that UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who as a small perquisite of his job is provided a

Did he or didn’t he?
Tenacious Claudia Rosett, who’s made something of a specialty of plumbing the UN’s murkier depths, in a New York Sun article reveals that the Secretary seems to have hung on to an apartment to which by all rights he is no longer entitled, passing it along through his extended family:
As Secretary-General Annan prepares to leave his post at the United Nations, a mystery is surfacing surrounding his apartment on Roosevelt Island, subsidized by
To me the story’s interesting not so much as it concerns the outgoing UN Secretary General, about whom most people have long since made up their minds one way or another, but rather because Ms. Rosett’s inferences are entirely plausible since the behaviors they describe are very representative of the practical challenges of designing and maintaining means-tested or income-targeted housing affordability, especially in tight markets like New York City:
The apartment was where Mr. Annan and his wife lived before 1997, when he became secretary-general. The

The whole complex was developed in the mid-1970s
For years, the Annans saved considerable sums by occupying an apartment meant to help financially strapped low- to moderate-income
One question Mr. Annan has never addressed is why he and his wife felt comfortable availing themselves of this generous arrangement.
This kind of apartment, part of a state-regulated housing development program called Mitchell-Lama, is subject to strict eligibility requirements, involving family size and financial ceilings on combined family income. There is also a requirement that the leaseholder make continuous use of the apartment as a primary residence.
Let’s consider the Annan apartment as a microcosm of the program design challenges, all of them arising out of two factors:
· Affordability is a bargain to the lucky household, and householders like to give it to their friends.
· An affordable tenancy lasts many years, during which household composition and income profile change.

More bedrooms needed
Initial certification and household composition. Sustainable affordable housing does not exist in economic nature; it costs money, and the benefits conferred can be substantial:
The effective
A subsidized apartment, like the one linked to the Annans, rents for less than half that amount, or just under $2,000 a month. While some allowance might be made for wear and tear, the current effective taxpayer subsidy for the Annan apartment could, by a conservative estimate, amount to upward of $10,000 a year, or even as much as twice that, which, over a decade, adds up to a significant sum.
When government funding is involved, most programs desire consciously to deliver the affordability to worthy (low or moderate-income) residents. What constitutes the initial household, and how is the household’s income established?

Mr. Annan and his second wife, Nane (Lagergren) Annan
She is an heir to
Do household assets, or those of the extended family, count in the income eligibility determination? Under most HUD programs, spousal income counts but family assets do not.
Over-income residents. Once a resident has moved in, his or her family circumstances may change, and the breadwinner may secure a promotion. Mr. Annan has worked for the UN since 1962, most of that time in
Telephone records show that Kofi Annan first moved into Mitchell-Lama housing around 1978, which suggests that by the time he moved out in 1996, he may have secured state subsidized rental rates for himself for a period as long as 18 years — depending on what he did with the apartment while working in Switzerland for part of the 1980s.
Due to Mr. Annan’s hard work and good fortune, his income rose:

Island House,
And his household composition also changed:
He married his second wife, Nane [Lagergren] Annan, in 1984 and returned with her to
Throughout these moves, including these lengthy postings abroad (e.g.
Transfers of tenancy. Once Mr. Annan moved out, shouldn’t the apartment have reverted to the next eligible waiting-list resident?
Those low- to moderate-income
It’s certainly a valuable rental space:
Over the decade since he moved out, this reporter suggests that a conservative estimate of the effective
Yet even today it appears that a member of Mr. Annan’s extended family lives there:
Another is how it is that, since Mr. Annan and his wife left that
Exact details are hard to come by. Mitchell-Lama authorities, while willing to disclose rental rates, said the identities of individual leaseholders are confidential. The various Annans involved, including the secretary-general, his brother, and his sister-in-law, have refused to answer all but a few questions related to the apartment. Queries to Kofi Annan’s U.N. office asking for such details as whether and when he gave up the lease and how the apartment passed to his brother’s family elicited no reply beyond an email from the secretary-general’s spokesman saying Mr. Annan “has always lived within his means” and that during Mr. Annan’s many years in New York, “he has always been a law-abiding resident.”
Not exactly helpful or responsive.

Does that answer your question?
[Mr. Annan’s brother] Kobina Annan, reached last week by phone at the Ghanaian embassy in
He added: “While I’m not there, my son lives there.” But when then asked how long he had held the lease, he abruptly hung up.
At the time of that conversation, the ambassador’s wife, Ekua Annan, was in
A call that same day to a number currently listed in a

Don’t hang up the phone when Claudia Rosett calls …
Ms. Rosett’s article then connects various other documents related to the Oil-for-Food scandal into inferences that Mr. Annan has maintained his residency throughout. Still, it’s conceivable that he and his wife were living there with Mr. Annan’s brother and his wife:
Mitchell-Lama regulations specify that in some cases a lease may be turned over to family members such as a brother or sister-in-law if they have lived continuously for two years previous to the handover in the same apartment, using it as a primary residence. Before moving out, did Kofi and Nane Annan share their
Over-housing. Even as household configurations change, so too change the number of people in the household. Under most programs such as Section 8 vouchers, changes in household size occasion a change in permitted apartment, and when households are becoming larger, the family typically can in to a new larger unit. When the household shrinks — children move away from home, say, or a couple divorces — administration seldom catches up. Many tenants become ‘over-housed,’ occupying space to which they would not be entitled on move-in but which nobody is asking them to vacate:
The questions multiply. Did Kofi Annan ever give up the lease on his old

Nobody’s talking
Ms. Rosett is understandably both skeptical and deeply cynical:
Mr. Annan, after announcing a new policy of U.N. financial disclosure as part of his reforms over the past year, has refused to disclose to the public his own financial records. When Paul Volcker’s investigation into the U.N. Oil-for-Food scandal took a confidential look at Kofi Annan’s financial affairs last year, investigators declared them clean. But Mr. Volcker provided almost no specifics, releasing none of the underlying documents.
Unfortunately for those of us who care about affordable housing, one can observe that in systems with a restricted supply of cheap apartments whose occupants are not actively means-tested, there is a discouraging tendency for the apartment to migrate from the needy to the politically or socially connected.
The enclave is known for its heavy concentration of U.N. staff, many of whom receive U.N. housing allowances on top of whatever savings they might enjoy at the expense of
Although much of
It becomes another perk of membership in the incumbents’ club. Small wonder that some New York Republicans wasted no time in fulminating:
State and city legislators have expressed outrage over the Annan family’s use of the Roosevelt Island apartment — which Mr. Annan lived in before becoming U.N. secretary-general 10 years ago — calling it “corrupt” and “unreal.”
Years ago, when Cambridge had rent control, its opponents delighted in pointing out that the then-mayor (Ken Reeves) lived in a rent controlled apartment, as did the Crown Prince of Denmark.
Ken Reeves, the mayor of
Even worse for rent-control defenders, once these individuals were pointed out, they were stout in their defense of their right to occupy under the rent control system, which only increased voter antipathy in western
No one is saying that any of the Annans have broken the law; the regulations for Mitchell-Lama housing allow a certain amount of flexibility once applicants have obtained a lease. But the issue is pertinent because Kofi Annan, whose wife comes from one of Sweden’s wealthier families, has spent years lecturing Americans on how the well-heeled have obligations to those less fortunate.
I do think that those who have more have a moral duty to help others — and those in power have a moral duty to be upright.

Purer than Caesar’s wife
This makes obstructive and evasive answers all the more depressing:
The Sun sent a list of detailed questions about the apartment for yesterday’s article, but Mr. Annan’s spokesman, Stephane Dujarric, limited his response to two blanket statements. The outgoing secretary-general “has always lived within his means,” Mr. Dujarric said, and during his many years in
A final depressing coda. Even as Mr. Annan was as a parting gift signing new regulations tightening UN procurement procedures:
UNITED NATIONS — In his last U.N. press conference, Secretary-General Annan yesterday sidestepped a question about how the lease of a sought-after low-income residence he once lived in came to be held by a member of his family.
