Month: October, 2006

The 50-year trends in affordable housing: Part 2, the market, financial

24 October, 2006 (09:20) | Uncategorized |

 

[Continued from yesterday's Part 1.]

Yesterday we covered four fifty-year trends:

Cities move from manufacturing to information and knowledge work.
Land use rules proliferate and development becomes more protracted.
Houses become larger, lots become smaller.
Housing costs more as a percentage of income.

These four physical-market trends stimulated responses in the capital and financial markets:

5. [...]

The 50-year trends in affordable housing: Part 1, the market, physical

23 October, 2006 (09:09) | Uncategorized |

 

The more I study affordable housing,

That’s a lot harder than I worked

the clearer it becomes that what we have witnessed in the last half-century is a revolution in just about everything our parents took for granted about their homes and cities. But this was an accelerated continuous change rather than any [...]

Public housing: relatively under control

20 October, 2006 (10:58) | Uncategorized |

Even allowing for its tone of sanctimonious, you-do-I-critique grandstanding quality, a recent State Auditor’s Office report [5 Meg link in .pdf] on Massachusetts public housing paints a depressing and grim picture of an inventory suffering from financial starvation, as reported in this recent Boston Globe story:
 
The state auditor blasted the Romney administration’s funding of [...]

Six tips for program design

19 October, 2006 (10:02) | Uncategorized |

About halfway through his provocative albeit unstructured book The Anglosphere Challenge, verbally peripatetic author James C. Bennett
 

James C. Bennett: You need a hard hat to design housing programs
 
briskly lists (pages 136-137) six terrific, cogent rules of thumb for state intervention, applicable to affordable housing.
 

Six useful points!
 
1.            Avoid self-deception.  Admit that interventions have a price.  [...]

A duty to whom? Part 3, the response

18 October, 2006 (12:35) | Uncategorized |

[Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and Part 1.]
 

Yesterday we saw that, in the lushly populated home-mortgage financial ecosystem, those closest to the borrower (individual agents and mortgage originators) were quite understandably marketing aggressively the new lower-payment-per-dollar-of-house loan variants that included not just interest-only loans but negative-amortization loans. Insurers were whimpering that lenders [...]